托福口语考察7大要求标准分析解读

托福口语如何才能拿到高分?考生对于具体的口语考试要求标准可能并不完全了解，有些只知道个大概但细节还缺乏认识。下面小编就和大家分享托福口语考察7大要求标准分析解读，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧

托福口语考察7大要求标准分析解读

1. 中心是否切题：

考察托福考生所表达的口语内容是否完整、准确地回答了题目的要求。考察重点在于考生是否能够准确理解题意和准确迎合题意两个层次。

2. 意思是否明白：

考察托福考生所表达的口语内容是否能够被明白地理解，还是表面上很流利，而实际上语义含糊、不知所云。

3. 结构是否严密：

考察托福考生是否有能力将口语用严密的结构和逻辑表达出来，还是缺乏层次，信马由缰。

4. 表达是否连贯：

考察托福考生口语的语流是否有停顿，这包括思维停顿和表达停顿两方面的原因或表现。但此标准并未对考生的口语表达速度作硬性的要求。

5. 发音是否清楚：

考察托福考生的发音是否能够做到纯正、清晰。起码理解起来并不因为口音的问题存在障碍。

6. 语法是否正确：

考察托福考生是否能够熟练的使用较复杂的句子结构表达思想，同时尽量避免错误。环球英语网校。

7. 词汇是否熟练：

考察托福考生是否可以掌握足够的英语词汇进行表达，考察重点在熟练度和准确度两个方面。但此标准并未对考生的用词难度作硬性的要求。

托福口语要求考点分析

结合上面的要求，托福口语考试大致从三个方面考察考生。一、逻辑性;二、语言表述;三、语言能力。上述七个标准里的1、2、3大至可划分为第一类，即要考察学生的思维逻辑性。这就首先要求学生在较短的准备时间里迅速审清题目要求，然后在头脑中形成一个清晰的纲要。这样可以使自己的叙述内容清晰而有条理。标准4主要考察学生的语言表达能力，比如连贯性、清晰度和信息量等。评分标准里并没有对语速有硬性要求。但建议考生语速保持在中速的水平上，因为过慢会使得信息量小，让考官怀疑你的语言能力，而过快又会容易出错，不易让自己有思考的时间。标准5、6、7是对语言能力的考察。这就要求考生平时注重自己语言基本功的训练。跟读模仿可以纠正自己的发音，背诵可以增加词汇量，句式结构和地道的英语表述方法。

托福口语话题汇总分类80个

人物类

01 good teacher

02 good parent

03 good friend

04 good leader

05 person you admire

06 leader or follower

物体类

07 an important object

08 an important invention

09 an important letter

10 most useful book

11 efficient transportation

12 miss the most

地点类

13 a place that you like most

14 favorite room

15 a school

16 together with your friends (place)

17 public place

18 plain

事件类

19 celebration event

20 most important decision

21 best time in a year

22 enjoyable event

23 most happy event

24 deep impression

25 challenging experience

26 special opportunity

27 good news

28 ask for help

学习工作类

29 help research

30 books and internet

31 study alone

32 study method

33 work in an office

34 studying by oneself

35 with discussions

36 big city

37 personal experience

38 most important lesson

39 choose major

40 ideal career

41 goal to fulfill

42 skill learning

43 job or career

44 job or interests

46 intern

生活类

47 restaurant

48 eat at home

49 live with others

50 by telephone

教育类

51 attend college

52 one year break

53 college education

54 all students

55 higher education

56 music and art

57 sports courses

58 dormitory

59 uniforms

60 recycling

道德选择

61 tell the truth

62 appearance

63 If I have money

64 emergencies

个人爱好类

65 spare time

66 relaxed life

67 relax myself

68 short vacations

69 sight‐seeing

70 fictions

71 type of movies

72 together with friends (sports)

社会类

73 TV

74 guide children TV

75 media

76 computers

77 old buildings

78 forbid cellphones

79 artistic places

80 more influence

托福口语话题科技素材整理

Some people believe that modern technology has made our lives simpler. Others believethat modern technology has made our lives more complicated. What is your opinion?

让我们首先一起来阅读这篇On science and good life.

既可以积累素材，也可以激发灵感：

There is probably no limit to what science can do in the way of increasing positive excellence. Health has already been greatly improved; in spite of the lamentations of those who idealize the past, we live longer and have fewer illnesses than any class or nation in the eighteenth century. With a little more application of the knowledge we already possess, we might be much healthier than we are. And future discoveries are likely to accelerate this process enormously.

科学在增加美好的积极因素方面所能做的事情，很可能是没有止境的。卫生条件已经得到极大的改善;不管那些怀旧者如何哀叹，与十八世纪任何阶级和民族相比，我们毕竟延长了寿命并减少了疾病。只要把我们已有的知识稍加广泛地应用，我们就会比现在更加健康。未来的发现很可能会极大地加快这方面的进程。

So far, it has been physical science that has had most effect upon our lives, but in the future physiology and psychology are likely to be far more potent. When we have discovered how character depends upon physiological conditions, we shall be able, if we choose, to produce far more of the type of human beings that we admire. Intelligence, artistic capacity, benevolence—all these things no doubt could be increased by science. There seems scarcely any limit to what could be done in the way of producing a good world, if only men would use science wisely.

迄今为止，对我们生活影响最大的当数自然科学，但是在将来，生理学和心理学的影响很可能远在它之上。当我们发现了性格如何依赖于生理条件时，只要我们愿意，我们就能产生出大量我们所称羡的那种人。智力，艺术能力，仁慈---所有这些东西无疑可因科学而增加。只要人们明智地利用科学，在创造美好世界方面所能做的事情，几乎是没有止境的。

There is a certain attitude about the application of science to human life with which I have some sympathy, though I do not, in the last analysis, agree with it. It is the attitude of those who dread what is ‘unnatural.’ Rousseau is, of course, the great protagonist of the view in Europe. In Asia, Lao-Tze has set it forth even more persuasively, and 2400 years sooner. I think there is a mixture of truth and falsehood in the admiration of ‘nature, which it is important to disentangle. To begin with, what is ‘natural?’ Roughly speaking, anything to which the speaker was accustomed in childhood. Lao-Tze objects to roads and carriages and boats, all of which were probably unknown in the village where he was born

关于科学应用到人生这个问题，存在着一种观点，对这种观点，我有些同感，但是最后分析起来，我是不能同意的。 它是那些害怕‘不自然的’东西的人所持有的观点。当然，卢梭是欧洲这一观点的伟大创始人。在亚洲，老子对这一观点的阐述，更是动人心弦，而且要早两千四百年。我认为，他们对于‘自然’的赞美，不过是真理与谬误的混合物，而理清这一问题是很重要的。首先要问，什么东西是‘自然的?’泛泛说来，是说话者幼年时所习惯的东西。老子反对车道和舟车，这恐怕是他所出生的那个村子不知车道和舟车为何物的缘故。

Rousseau has got used to these things, and does not regard them as against nature. But he would no doubt have thundered against railways if he had lived to see them. Clothes and cooking are too ancient to be denounced by most of the apostles of nature, though they all object to new fashions in either. Birth control is thought wicked by people who tolerate celibacy, because the former is a new violation of nature and the latter an ancient one. In these ways those who preach ‘nature’ are inconsistent, and one is tempted to regard them as mere conservatives.

卢梭对这些东西习以为常，所以并不认为它们是违反自然的。但是，假如他在有生之年看见铁路，他无疑会大加指责。服装和烹饪由来已久，大多数提倡自然的人都不提出异议，虽然它们一致反对花样翻新。节育被当成犯罪，而独身则被宽容，因为前者是违反自然的新事物，而后者则古已有之。在所有这些方面，那些提倡‘自然’的人都是自相矛盾的，这只能使人把它们看成是守旧之士。

Nevertheless, there is something to be said in their favor. Take for instance vitamins, the discovery of which has produced a revulsion in favor of ‘natural’ foods. It seems, however, that vitamins can be supplied by cod-liver oil and electric light, which are certainly not part of the ‘natural’ diet of a human being. This case illustrates that, in the absence of knowledge, unexpected harm may be done by a new departure from nature, but when the harm has come to be understood it can usually be remedied by some new artificiality. As regards our physical environment and our physical means of gratifying our desires, I do not think the doctrine of ‘nature’ justifies anything beyond a certain experimental caution in the adoption of new expedients. Clothes, for instance, are contrary to nature, and need to be supplemented by another unnatural practice, namely washing, if they are not to bring disease. But the two practices together make a man healthier than the savage who eschews both.

然而，他们并非一无是处。例如，维生素的发现使人们复而赞成‘自然的’食物。不过，维生素似乎也可由鱼肝油和电光提供，此二者无疑不是人类‘自然的’食物。这个例子表明，如果缺少知识，一种违反自然的新做法也许会带来意想不到的危害，但是当那危害被认识到时，往往可以用某种新的人造物去补救。就我们的自然环境和满足我们欲望的物质手段而言，我认为，有关‘自然’的这套理论，除了证明在采取某种新的做法时应谨慎外，并不能证明别的什么。例如，衣服是违反自然的，如果不想让衣服引起疾病，就需要增加另一种不自然的行为，即洗涤。但是，穿衣与洗涤加在一起却可使人比与此二者无缘的野蛮人要健康。