GRE写作如何冲刺高分

对不少备考GRE的考生来说，GRE写作拿到满分似乎是一件MISSION IMPOSSIBLE的事情，不过，如果能掌握一些要点和技巧，充分准备下也未必就无法取得满分，下面小编就和大家分享GRE写作如何冲刺高分，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE写作如何冲刺高分

GRE写作满分要点和技巧建议：必须研究范文

研究范文，尤其是5分和6分的范文是非常重要的。因为范文可以说是最权威的辅导资料。要求不是简单的熟读和背诵，而是逐字逐句的体会作者的意思及修辞。看范文的同时也要看ETS对范文的评论，非常精彩，也可以参考学习。这会非常有利于理解考试所考的重点。

GRE写作满分要点和技巧建议：必须要熟练

必须要做到形成惯性思维，考试时间非常紧张，只有有充分思维准备的人，才能驾轻就熟，运用自如。题目中提到politics，大脑中就应当出现Franklin Roosevelt， Lincoln， Gerhard Schroeder， Gandhi; 提到art，就该想到Rembrandt， Van Gogh， Starry night， night watch， Hemmingway， the old man and the sea; 提到Scandal，就该想到Nixon，Watergate，bill Clinton，sex sandal，Enron。总之，熟练非常重要.

GRE写作满分要点和技巧建议：借鉴别人的文章

学习他人的文章和写作思路，是提高自己水平的有效途径。参考优秀的高分满分作文，学习词汇和句式的用法，总结经验心得，对于自己的提升也是巨大的。

GRE写作满分要点和技巧建议：多动脑筋多思考

多写不如多改，多改不如多想，针对写作思路，自我总结，思考适合自己的写作方式，思考自己擅长的论证方法，总之，要多想。活跃思维的同时也提高了思考能力。

GRE写作满分要点和技巧建议：通读GRE作文题库

GRE作文的题库是完全开放的，考前把题目都过一遍，了解其中的思路和写作方式，在考试中碰到可以大量节省时间，提高写作效率。

以上就是GRE写作拿到满分的一些要点和技巧建议，GRE高分甚至满分作文需要生动的词汇及正确的语法、严密的逻辑结构，新鲜的论据等，希望各位考生都能从中学到一些东西，预祝大家取得圆满的成绩。

GRE写作满分范文赏析

The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Silver Screen Movie Production Company.  

"According to a recent report from our marketing department, fewer people attended movies produced by Silver Screen during the past year than in any other year.  And yet the percentage of generally favorable comments by movie reviewers about specific Silver Screen movies actually increased during this period.  Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers; so the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available.  Silver Screen should therefore spend more of its budget next year on reaching the public through advertising and less on producing new movies."  

The argument presented above is relatively sound, however, the author fails to recognize all the elements necessary to evaluate his situation.  The idea that more money be invested in advertising may be a helpful one, but perhaps not because people are unaware of the current reviews.  To clarify, it may be necessary to advertise more in order to increase sales, however that could be due to many circumstances such as a decrease in the public's overall attendance, an increase in the cost of movies, or a lack of trust in the opinions of the reviewers.  

The advertising director first needs to determine the relative proportion of movie goers that choose to see Silver Screen films.  That will help him to understand his market share.  If the population in general is attending less, then he may still be out-profiting his competitors, despite his individual sales decrease.  In fact, his relative sales could be increasing.  Determining where he stands in his market will help him to create and implement an action plan.  

Another important thing to consder is the relative cost of attending movies to the current standard of living.  If the standard of living is decreasing, it may contribute to an overall decrease in attendance.  In that case, advertising could be very helpful, in that a clever campaign could emphasize the low cost of movies as compared to many other leisure activities.  This could offset financial anxieties of potential customers.  

Finally, it is important to remember that people rarely trust movie reviewers.  For that reason, it is important that the films appeal to the populus, and not critics alone.  The best advertisement in many cases is word of mouth.  No matter what critics say, people tend to take the opinions of friends more seriously.  This supports continual funding to produce quality movies that will appeal to the average person.  

There is no reason that silver screen should not spend more on advertisement, however, there is reason to continue to invest in diverse, quality films.  Furthermore, the company must consider carefully what it chooses to emphasize in its advertisement.  

Commentary  

Although the response begins by stating that the argument "is relatively sound," it immediately goes on to develop a critique.  The response identifies three major flaws in the argument and provides a careful and thorough analysis.  The main points discussed are that  

-- the fall-off in attendance might be industry wide 

-- the general state of the economy might have affected movie    attendance 

-- movie goers "rarely trust movie reviewers"  

Each of these points is developed; together they are presented within the context of a larger idea: that while spending more money on advertising may be helpful, the company should "continue to invest in diverse, quality films."  

This is a smoothly written, well-developed analysis in which syntactic variety and the excellent use of transitions make for a virtually seamless response.  This paper clearly merits a score of 6.

GRE写作高分范文：公正的法律

“There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws。”

有两种法律：公正和不公正的。每个社会成员都有责任遵守公正的法律，但更重要的是，更应该不遵守和反抗不公正的法律。

关键词：obey just lawsdisobey and resist unjust laws

GRE写作范文：

论证分析

当我们面对司法改革，提出探讨司法理念时，往往会以“什么是司法的公正”、 “什么是法官的美德”等这样的形式提出问题。这种形式的问题所问的是关于一般的公正和美德的问题。在司法的实践中，对于具体的判决，人们一般是能够评判是否公正的，而问题是评判有无共性呢?如果不存在，那么人们的评判又是以什么为标准的呢?如果存在，那它又是怎样存在的呢?存在于哪里?而依照西方哲学的观点，这种存在于我们可感知的具体事物之外的东西就是法的理念。

众所周知，亚里土多德曾说过，要实现法治必须具备两个因素：其一，所有人都服从法律;其二，被遵守的法律本身是良好的法律。 亚里土多德的说法看似全面，但在实践中可能并不有效。

比如什么是良法，比如有人对允许堕胎、 安乐死、 同性恋的法律持有尖锐不同的观点。人认为允许堕胎维护了女性的自身权利，允许安乐死和同性恋表现了对个人自由意志和愿望的尊重;有人则认为允许堕胎是不人道的，没有保护胎儿的生存权利，允许安乐死违背了人的生存主旨，允许同性恋则败坏了社会的道德风气。在这种情况下，我们应当认定谁的观念是正确的?

我们又依据什么权力和所谓的理性剥夺和否定另外一些人的观念呢?此外，人们对某一事物的好坏认识会随时间的推移而发生变化，从前认为良好的法律现在可能认为不好，这时又怎么办呢?

因此，当认为某些法律不是良好的法律时，人们便会认为自己没有服从的义务，这样便会出现不服从法律的现象。进而言之，坚持“良好的法律”这一概念可能会使法治处于困难的境地。

Should we obey an unjust law? According to the theory of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 18th century French political philosopher, in a democratic society the state represents the general will of the citizens, and that in obeying its laws each citizen is pursuing his own real interests. Thus, in an ideal state, laws express the general will. An individual who disagrees with a law must be failing to look at things from the moral standpoint. Rousseau is talking about an ideal state where laws express people's general will, a will that aims at the common good. But the question is: are we living in an ideal state and do all the laws of our land express the common will of the people and should we obey all the laws even if they are unjust? Thenswer to this question can be different for different people.